case law for vcsst - An Overview
case law for vcsst - An Overview
Blog Article
We make no warranties or guarantees about the precision, completeness, or adequacy with the information contained on this site, or maybe the information linked to about the state site. Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can generate inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
Case law is specific to your jurisdiction in which it was rendered. For illustration, a ruling in a California appellate court would not commonly be used in deciding a case in Oklahoma.
ten . Const. P. 235/2025 (S.B.) Atif S/o Latif V/S Province of Sindh and others Sindh High Court, Karachi The regulation enjoins the police to generally be scrupulously fair on the offender as well as Magistracy is to be certain a fair investigation and fair trial for an offender. Unfortunately, these objectives have remained unfulfilled. Aberrations of police officers and police excesses in dealing with the regulation and order situation have been the topic of adverse comments from this Court in addition to from other courts Nonetheless they have did not have any corrective effect on it. The police has the power to arrest a person even without obtaining a warrant of arrest from a court.
Persuasive Authority – Prior court rulings that may very well be consulted in deciding a current case. It may be used to guide the court, but isn't binding precedent.
2299 of 2025. The findings are pending finalization and will be submitted without delay. Additionally they stated that directives for strict compliance have been issued to all Karachi models, with non-compliance going through departmental action. Furthermore, they submitted that an existing enquiry is underway. Therefore, They're directed to complete the proceedings and submit the enquiry report to this court through MIT-II of this Court. twelve. This petition stands disposed of in the above terms. Read more
Civil Courts keep jurisdiction over title disputes in partition matters. Agreement to sell does not confer title; it needs legal transfer of title. Agreement to sell must be developed and properly exhibited in evidence. Declining relief based on an unproduced and un-exhibited sale agreement is legally unsustainable. Read more
In 1996, the Nevada Division of Child and Family Services (“DCFS”) removed a 12-year outdated boy from his home to protect him from the horrible physical and sexual abuse he experienced experienced in his home, and to prevent him from abusing other children while in the home. The boy was placed within an emergency foster home, and was later shifted all around within the foster care system.
In federal or multi-jurisdictional regulation systems there could exist conflicts between the various lessen appellate courts. Sometimes these differences is probably not resolved, and it may be necessary to distinguish how the regulation is applied in a single district, province, division or appellate department.
163 . Const. P. 4965/2023 (D.B.) Saleem Khan V/S Province of Sindh & Others Sindh High Court, Karachi It is perfectly-settled that whilst looking at the more info case of normal promotion of civil servants, the competent authority needs to evaluate the merit of many of the eligible candidates and after due deliberations, to grant promotion to these types of eligible candidates who are found being most meritorious among them. For the reason that petitioner was held to be senior to his colleagues who were promoted in BS-19, the petitioner was dismissed by the respondent department just to increase favor towards the blue-eyed candidate based on OPS, which is apathy to the part with the respondent department.
This Court may interfere where the authority held the proceedings against the delinquent officer in a manner inconsistent with the rules of natural justice or in violation of statutory rules prescribing the mode of inquiry or where the conclusion or finding reached by the disciplinary authority is based on no evidence. If the summary or finding is such as no reasonable person would have ever arrived at, the Court may perhaps interfere with the summary or maybe the finding and mildew the relief to make it proper for the facts of every case. In service jurisprudence, the disciplinary authority is the sole judge of facts. Where the appeal is presented, the appellate authority has coextensive power to re-appreciate the evidence or maybe the nature of punishment. Around the aforesaid proposition, we have been fortified through the decision in the Supreme Court during the case of Ghulam Murtaza Shaikh v. Chief Minister Sindh (2024 SCMR 1757). Bench: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Creator) Source: Order: Downloads 337 Order Date: 24-JAN-twenty five Approved for Reporting WhatsApp
162 . Const. P. 256/2025 (D.B.) Hafeezullah V/S Govt of Sindh & Others Sindh High Court, Karachi It is nicely-settled that the civil servants must first pursue internal appeals within 90 days. When the appeal is not really decided within that timeframe, he/she can then approach the service tribunal to challenge the first order. Once they are doing so, the Tribunal must decide the appeal on merits and cannot merely direct the department to decide it, since the ninety days for that department to act has already expired. Around the aforesaid proposition, we've been guided by the decision from the Supreme Court while in the case of Dr.
10. Based within the findings of the inquiry committee, this petition will not be deemed maintainable and is therefore liable to generally be dismissed, which is dismissed accordingly with pending application(s) if any. Read more
Where there are several members of a court deciding a case, there could be a person or more judgments presented (or reported). Only the reason to the decision from the majority can constitute a binding precedent, but all might be cited as persuasive, or their reasoning can be adopted in an argument.
The figured out Tribunal shall decide the case on merits, without being influenced by the findings while in the Impugned order, after recording of evidence of the respective parties. Read more